Funding Submissions Built to
Survive an Assessment Panel.
A funding window gives you weeks to represent months of work an assessment panel expects in full: epidemiological precision, a defensible program model, and a health economic case that actually holds up. Percova builds AusTender bids, Commonwealth and MRFF grant applications, and investment-ready business cases structured around the criteria your assessors are scoring against — not a generic proposal template.
Why grant-ready is different from well-written.
A well-written proposal and a grant-ready one are not the same thing. Assessment panels for major Commonwealth and philanthropic funding rounds score against explicit criteria — evidence strength, value for money, organisational capability, sustainability — and a submission that doesn't visibly address each one loses regardless of how strong the underlying program idea is.
Percova structures every submission around the funder's actual evaluation matrix from the outset: the epidemiology justifies the program model, the program model is costed in the financial case, and the financial case is expressed in the value-for-money language the panel is scoring against.
The core of every Percova funding submission.
- ■AusTender Bids & Commonwealth Grant Applications — structured to Commonwealth Grant Rules and the specific assessment criteria of the funding round
- ■MRFF & Philanthropic Grant Writing — applications aligned to medical research and philanthropic funder requirements
- ■Grant-Ready Proposal Structuring — compliance-writing matched line-by-line to the funder's assessment matrix
- ■Business Case Development — the full narrative investment case, from problem definition through to implementation and evaluation plan
Each component is developed to the depth the brief requires, with scope confirmed in your fixed-fee proposal.
The cost-effectiveness analysis, budget impact modelling, and SROI figures that go into these submissions are built by our Health Economics & Modelling capability — activated as part of the same engagement wherever a submission needs a quantified economic case, not commissioned separately.
Structured for deadline-driven timelines.
Grant and tender deadlines don't wait for coordination between specialists. Percova's model activates the epidemiology, program design, financial modelling, and compliance-writing capabilities a submission needs in parallel rather than in sequence — so a four-to-eight-week funding window doesn't force a choice between a rushed submission and an underselling one.
Tell us about the funding round you're targeting.
Bring us the guidelines and the deadline. We'll map what the submission needs before any drafting begins. Fixed-scope proposals are provided at no cost.