Health Economics That Makes the
Investment Case, Not Just the Cost Estimate.
A strong program idea without a defensible economic case doesn't get funded — and a cost estimate isn't the same thing as an investment case. Percova provides health economics consulting that connects the clinical and population evidence directly to the financial argument, so the numbers a funder, board, or department sees are traceable back to the underlying epidemiology, not asserted on their own.
Numbers that trace back to evidence, not the other way around.
Health economic modelling is often treated as a final step — a cost line added once the program design is finished. Percova's model runs epidemiology and health economics together from the start, so the burden-of-disease data that justifies the program is the same data the cost-effectiveness analysis is built on. The result is a financial case an assessor can trace back to its evidentiary source, not one that has to be taken on faith.
The core of every Percova health economics brief.
- ■Cost-Effectiveness Analysis — the return on a specific program investment, modelled against defined outcomes
- ■Burden-of-Disease Modelling — the population-level cost of inaction, quantified against current data
- ■Budget Impact Modelling — the financial implications of a program over its full implementation timeline, not just its first year
- ■Social Return on Investment (SROI) — the non-financial value case, quantified for funders and boards who weigh impact beyond dollars
- ■Financial Scenario Planning — modelling multiple investment or scale options side by side for a board or funding decision
- ■Health Data Analytics & Surveillance — current AIHW, ABS, and jurisdictional data integrated into the modelling, not generic benchmarks
Each component is developed to the depth the brief requires, with scope confirmed in your fixed-fee proposal.
This modelling sits inside a grant, tender, or business case as often as it stands alone — if yours does, see Funding & Business Cases for how the two come together in a single submission.
Built to stand up in front of a board or a funder.
Every Percova health economics output is reviewed by a senior practitioner and cross-checked against the epidemiological and program-design work it depends on — because a model that can't explain its own assumptions doesn't survive a funder's second question.
Tell us what decision the numbers need to support.
A cost-effectiveness case for a funder, a budget impact model for a department, or a full investment case for a board — tell us the decision, and we'll scope the modelling it actually needs. Fixed-scope proposals are provided at no cost.